1. Remarks such as “If you (doctors) do not want to work, then resign. You are not factory workers who resort to such protests. Shame on you. How can doctors behave in such a manner?” by none other than Chief Judge of Bombay HC
“YES SIR, WE ARE FACTORY WORKERS. OUR FACTORY IS CALLED HOSPITAL & WE REPAIR BROKEN HUMAN BODIES. OUR LIFE IS DEARER TO US THAN OUR JOB, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER FACTORY WORKER.”
2. “No Surgery can claim 100% recovery”…, “In order to recover, the patient is expected to comply with the advice of the doctor”.. Above were the two important takeaways from a recent judgment made by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission bench consisting of Justice Ajit Bharoake and Anup K Thakur in a revision petition of a case alleging medical negligence.
Case Details : BALJIT SINGH V/.s KUMAR HOSPITAL & ANR., Punjab, REVISION PETITION NO. 1975 OF 2016, decided on 07 Mar 2017
3. “Not all anomalies can be detected by ultrasound study.” A case claiming Rs.17 lakhs compensation was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, that was seen alleging failure on part of Doctors to diagnose fetal anomalies Case Details : S. SARAVANAN V/s. M/S. RASI CLINIC & 3 ORS, TAMILNADU. Judgment Dated : 20 Mar 2017.
4. “It would be unrealistic to expect the Doctors to subject every patient coming with a complaint of chest pain to advanced cardiac investigations, when ECG is normal” This was the observation made by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in a recent judgement in the case of MANDAR JADHAV V/.s DR. RIYA & ORS.CONSUMER CASE NO. 109 OF 2011.
“YES SIR, WE ARE FACTORY WORKERS. OUR FACTORY IS CALLED HOSPITAL & WE REPAIR BROKEN HUMAN BODIES. OUR LIFE IS DEARER TO US THAN OUR JOB, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER FACTORY WORKER.”
2. “No Surgery can claim 100% recovery”…, “In order to recover, the patient is expected to comply with the advice of the doctor”.. Above were the two important takeaways from a recent judgment made by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission bench consisting of Justice Ajit Bharoake and Anup K Thakur in a revision petition of a case alleging medical negligence.
Case Details : BALJIT SINGH V/.s KUMAR HOSPITAL & ANR., Punjab, REVISION PETITION NO. 1975 OF 2016, decided on 07 Mar 2017
3. “Not all anomalies can be detected by ultrasound study.” A case claiming Rs.17 lakhs compensation was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, that was seen alleging failure on part of Doctors to diagnose fetal anomalies Case Details : S. SARAVANAN V/s. M/S. RASI CLINIC & 3 ORS, TAMILNADU. Judgment Dated : 20 Mar 2017.
4. “It would be unrealistic to expect the Doctors to subject every patient coming with a complaint of chest pain to advanced cardiac investigations, when ECG is normal” This was the observation made by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in a recent judgement in the case of MANDAR JADHAV V/.s DR. RIYA & ORS.CONSUMER CASE NO. 109 OF 2011.
Comments
Post a Comment