Skip to main content

How to tame the Quackery?

 Quackery or health fraud is the promotion[1] of fraudulent or ignorant medical practices. A quack is a "fraudulent or ignorant pretender to medical skill" or "a person who pretends, professionally or publicly, to have skill, knowledge, qualification or credentials he or she does not possess;

Quackery, or the practice of medicine by unlicensed or untrained individuals, is indeed prevalent in India. The reasons for this are multifaceted and include a combination of societal, economic, educational, and regulatory factors:

 1. Historical and Cultural Roots: India has a rich tradition of alternative medicine systems like Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy. While many of these systems have proven effective and are part of the country's healthcare framework, the lack of clear distinction between these traditional practices and modern evidence-based medicine can sometimes lead to the acceptance of unproven treatments.

2. Low Awareness and Education: There is a significant gap in public understanding of the difference between scientifically proven medical practices and untested or fraudulent treatments. This is often exacerbated by the prevalence of pseudoscientific beliefs and practices passed down through generations.

3. Access to Healthcare: The public healthcare system in India is overburdened and often inaccessible to rural and economically disadvantaged populations. This leads people to seek alternative, and sometimes less reliable, sources of treatment.

4. Economic Considerations: Quackery is often more affordable than conventional medicine, which can be costly for many in a country with large income disparities. Moreover, the lack of regulation allows unscathed individuals to operate with impunity and charge lower prices.

5. Inadequate Regulation and Enforcement: Despite laws in place to regulate medical practice, enforcement is often lax. Quackery thrives in areas where there is a weak healthcare infrastructure and poor implementation of the existing legal framework.

6. Political Influence: Some quackery practices are supported by influential figures, including politicians, which can hinder the implementation of anti-quackery laws.

7. Lack of Strong Legal Measures: While there are laws to combat quackery, they are often not enforced strictly or are too lenient, allowing perpetrators to continue their practices.

8. Proliferation of Misinformation: The spread of false information through various channels, including traditional media and social media, further confuses the public and legitimizes quackery.

 To address the issue of quackery, the following pragmatic measures should be taken by the government, judiciary, and medical associations:

 Government:

1. Strengthen and enforce existing laws against quackery, ensuring that they are updated with the evolving landscape of medical practice.

Under the drugs and cosmetics Rules sec 66,The Drugs Control administration will order the medical shop owner with illegal activity,   to close for a few days and they reopen after that period and continue as usual.

Under the APAPMCE Act 2002, the Punishment for opening an allopathic hospital without registration in DRA is Rs 1,000.To pay that fine, DMHO has to file a case in the Court.The Quack restarts the practice after a few days or weeks in the same place or some other place.

In Karnataka : if any doctor open a clinic without registration under KPME Act 2007:3 years jail.

In Maharastra: without registration under Maharastra Govt established Medical councils for drs,Practitioner gets upto 5 years jail for first offence and upto 10 years jail for second offence.

2. Invest in public healthcare infrastructure to improve accessibility and reduce the reliance on unregulated medical practitioners.

3. Launch public awareness campaigns to educate the populace about the dangers of quackery and the importance of seeking treatment from qualified healthcare providers.

4. Implement stringent regulations for advertising and marketing of medical treatments to prevent misleading claims.

5. Create a centralized database of registered medical practitioners to facilitate easier verification of qualifications.

6. Support the growth of evidence-based traditional medicine by promoting research and standardization of practices.

 

Judiciary:

1. Impose severe penalties for those found guilty of practicing medicine without proper qualifications, including fines and imprisonment.

2. Expedite cases related to medical malpractice and quackery to serve as a deterrent.

3. Work with the government to ensure that laws are enforced uniformly across the country.

 

Medical Associations:

1. Engage in active surveillance and reporting of quackery to the relevant authorities.

2. Educate the public about the risks associated with unproven treatments and the importance of consulting licensed practitioners.

3. Offer affordable healthcare services to marginalized communities to reduce the demand for cheaper, unregulated alternatives.

4. Collaborate with traditional medicine practitioners to integrate evidence-based practices into mainstream healthcare and discourage the use of unproven methods.

5. Advocate for stricter educational standards and certification processes for all medical practitioners.

 In conclusion, tackling quackery in India requires a concerted effort from multiple stakeholders. By addressing the underlying causes and implementing effective measures, it is possible to reduce the prevalence of such practices and ensure that the population has access to safe and reliable healthcare.










Comments