The following matter is prepared by IMA think tank on the behest of MCI was duly submitted to the MCI and today(31-10-2017) MCI General Body has passed all the four documents made by MCI in collaboration with IMA.
Jacob Mathew guidelines:
Draft guidelines for prosecution under 304 A
Guidelines for protecting doctors from
frivolous or unjust prosecution against medical negligence
WHEREAS, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Mathew vs.
State of Punjab (AIR 2005 SC 3189) had observed that statutory rules or
executive instructions incorporating certain guidelines need to be
framed and issued by the Government of India and/or the State Governments in
consultation with the Medical Council of India;
WHEREAS, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had, "so
long as it is not done", proceeded to lay down certain guidelines which
should govern the prosecution of doctors for offences for which
criminal rashness or negligence is as ingredient. The following guidelines were
laid down:
"A private complaint may not be entertained
unless the complainant has produced prima facie evidence before the Court in
the form of a credible opinion given by another competent doctor to support the
charge of rashness or negligence on the part of the accused doctor.
8.6 Medical ethics MCI guidelines.
Rule 8.6 of the Code of Medical Ethics Regulations 2002 reads as under:
“Professional incompetence shall be judged by peer group as per guidelines prescribed by Medical Council of India”
Composition of the peer group :
a) Peer Group shall be constituted at Institutional / Clinical Establishment / State Medical Council / Medical Council of India level to judge the professional incompetency of a registered medical practitioner in a time-bound manner.
b) The peer group shall be a three-member committee with a chairman, one IMA nominee and one professional subject expert.
c) The peer group on receipt of any complaint shall examine the allegation in a time-bound manner, preferably within two weeks and forward its reasoned-out speaking order following the principle of natural justice and based on “Bolam’s Test” to the Institutional Head, Clinical Establishment Head / Chairman of the Ethics Committee of the State Medical Council / Chairman of theEthics Committee of the Medical Council of India as the case may be.
Permenand Kataria supreme Court guidlines.
OBLIGATIONS OF DOCTORS/HOSPITALS CONCERNING SERIOUSLY ILL/INJURED PERSONS
It may be noted that in the case of Pt. Parmanand Katara v.
Union of India [AIR 1989 SC 2039], the Medical Council of India has
submitted and that has been recorded in the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as
under:
“It is further submitted that it is for the
Government of India to take necessary and immediate steps to amend various
provisions of law which come in the way of Government Doctors as well as other
doctors in private hospitals or public hospitals to attend the injured/serious
persons immediately without waiting for the police report or completion of
police formalities. They should be free from fear that they would be
unnecessarily harassed or prosecuted for doing his duty without first complying
with the police formalities .......... It is further submitted that a doctor
should not feel himself handicapped in extending immediate help in such cases
fearing that he would be harassed by the Police or dragged to Court in
such a case. It is submitted that Evidence Act should also be so amended as to
provide that the Doctor’s diary maintained in regular course by him in respect
of the accident cases would be accepted by the courts in evidence without
insisting the doctors being present to prove the same or subject himself to
cross-examination/ harassment for long period of time.”
Whereas, the Council after consultation with the
representatives of the Indian Medical Association has prepared the annexed
format for Medico-legal cases that may be included as an Annexure to the Indian
Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002.
The suggested format is annexed.
In order that, this record be considered as evidence
in Court’s proceedings, without requiring the concerned registered medical
practitioner to attend Court’s proceedings, it must be ensured that the
Record is legible. Therefore, a typed copy of the record should be submitted to
the Court. Further, in criminal cases, information regarding the nature of
injury is crucial. Therefore, in the Medico-Legal Case Sheet/Doctor’s Diary
that is prepared the Registered Medical Practitioner should clearly record:
(i)Findings
(ii) Diagnosis
(iii) Reasons for Declaring the injury as
simple/grievous
(iv) Whether such injury is caused by accident/assault/unascertainable
A proposal in this regard if deemed appropriate may
be drafted by the Ministry of Law and Justice for amending the Indian Evidence
Act, 1972, in a time bound manner considering the requirement of criminal
investigation and trial. The above proposal after approval of the General Body
of the Council be transmitted to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Government of India for appropriate action at their end.
SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR MEDICO-LEGAL CASES
1. Name of the patient:
2. Age:
3. Sex:
4. Identification Marks (i) (ii)
5. Address:
6. Occupation:
7. Brought by:
8. Date of 1st visit:
9. History:
10. Clinical note (summary) of the case:
11. Prov.: Diagnosis :
12. Investigations advised with reports :
13. Diagnosis after investigation:
14. Nature of Injury:
15. Advice: (Including Procedure Done)
16. Reasons for Declaring the injury as simple/grievous
17. Whether the injury is caused by accident/assault/ unascertainable
18. Whether the injury under reference can be caused by other means also?
19. Follow up :
20. Observations:
21. Date:
Signature in full ………………………….
Name and Designation of Treating Physician
Name and Place of the Hospital:
Note:- The entries made in the above format should be typed.
Document on Indian Medical Service.
Taking stock of the entire situation, it is
recommended that the Govt. of India through the same mode, manner and modality
vide which Indian Administrative Services came to be created, create a Indian
Medical Services to cater to the larger cause of healthcare services in the
country from the point of view of efficacious management and meaningful
administration.
1. The terms, service
conditions, the modality of recruitment, allocation and allotment of cadre
would be akin to the one as is applicable to the Indian Administrative Services
personnel.
2. The eligibility for
appearing for the entrance examination for the Indian Medical Services would be
a graduate degree in health professional sciences as recognized in the
governing schedule.
The committee records its gratitude to the
President, Medical Council of India for having taken the prompt initiative and
constituted the present Study Group.
Find The Best best ent cosmetic surgeon avicenna hospital lahore
ReplyDelete. Prof. Dr. Ayub is best ENT specialist in Lahore and a best cosmetic surgeon in Lahore he is also known as best ENT doctor surgeon specialist and consultant. Get Online Appointment ENT Surgery Offers Treatment Of Disorders Of Ear, Nose And, Throat When Medicines And Non-invasive Treatment Approaches Fail To Recuperate.
ENT surgeon In Hameed Latif Hospital
ReplyDelete